Case Study: “Moonlighting OT”

Focus: explaining the potential conflict of interest if follow-up services are provided privately

An occupational therapist in a publicly funded, community-based facility is working with a 4-year-old boy diagnosed with autism. The child is getting ready to start kindergarten soon and has some issues with independent toileting, managing transitions, and certain fine-motor activities. The occupational therapist has established a strong therapeutic relationship with the child and his parents, and they have been making positive gains working together. The parents approach the occupational therapist at the next visit and ask that she also work privately with their son as they have access to some extra funding that must be used within the next few months. In this community there are occupational therapists in private practice who already provide this service. How should the occupational therapist proceed? (Select 2)

  1. Decline working with the family privately and provide the name of a past colleague/friend that now works privately.
  2. Decline working with the family privately and create a home program that she will modify on an as-needed basis.
  3. Decline working with the family privately and provide them with a list of occupational therapists in private practice.
  4. Decline working with the family privately but increase the frequency of visits to maintain their strong relationship.
  5. Agree to work with the family privately once she has appropriate insurance and storage for the client’s information.
  6. Discharge the child from her current caseload at the public facility so that she can work with the family privately.

College Preferred Answer

2 and 3 are correct

Conflict of Interest Practice Standard #1: Recognizing Conflict of Interest states that occupational therapists will “recognize if a situation involves any direct or indirect benefit (i.e. personal, professional, political, academic, financial, or material) to the occupational therapist that could affect his or her professional judgment” (p. 13). It also states that occupational therapists “consider whether others could potentially perceive a conflict of interest which could compromise the occupational therapist’s credibility and quality of client care” (p. 14).

1 is incorrect

The occupational therapist does not have to gain directly for there to be a conflict of interest. Others may still perceive a conflict of interest if the occupational therapist refers only to a past colleague/friend, when there are other suitable alternatives available.

4 is incorrect

Conflict of Interest Practice Standard #2: Preventing Conflict of Interest states that occupational therapists “avoid preferential … treatment towards particular clients or organizations” (p. 16). Increasing the frequency of visits beyond service levels typically offered by the centre could be perceived as preferential treatment.

5 is incorrect

Despite completing some of the necessary preparations to work privately, the occupational therapist is not addressing the conflict of interest that arises given the benefits she stands to gain.

6 is incorrect

The occupational therapist is not acting in the client’s best interest to discharge him from her current caseload and personally benefit by offering her services privately.

Additional Questions for Reflection

Additional questions for reflection, on your own or with others…

  • What would you do in a similar situation?
  • What other factors might have made it easier or more difficult for the occupational therapist to explain the conflict of interest?
  • What organizational policies are in place – or could be – to help prevent conflicts of interest in your practice?

References

College of Occupational Therapists of British Columbia. (2023). Conflict of interest practice standard #1: Recognizing Conflict of Interest (Rev. ed.), pp. 13-14.

College of Occupational Therapists of British Columbia. (2023). Conflict of interest practice standard #2: Preventing Conflict of Interest (Rev. ed.), pp. 16-17.